Archive for 03/07/2007

Be careful with that bat’s blood

There is an ever growing trend on the internet for people who claim to know about direct mail to post incredibly simplistic pieces which appear, within a couple of hundred words to tell you exactly how to make more money through direct mail.

 
I spotted one such today which said “Nothing Pulls Response like Emotion”.   This is at best half-true, at worst misleading. http://www.directmarketingnet.com/dmnviews/2007/06/adding_emotion_to_the_marketin.html
 
Like so many other statements in direct mail it gives you an insight into a possibility, but it suggests that this is the answer – do this and your troubles will be over.  At the heart of the article is the thought “Does your audience KNOW what it will feel like to accept your offer?”
 
It is a valid question – but it is left as having an obvious answer – there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest that it is helpful if your audience know how it will feel if you accept the offer.  There is no appeal to any psychological research – all we get now are bald statements.
 
At this point I am going to appear to be doing nothing but banging my own trumpet, because I am about to cite one of my own pieces – sorry if that seems disingenuous, but it seems the simplest way to make the point.  My article on emotion in direct mail point 3 in the article on http://www.theory.bz/psychology%20ofadvertising.htm includes this
Emotions are good - sometimes
The comments at the end of section 2 [the previous part of the article from which this extract comes] should not be taken to mean that emotions should not be used as part of selling.  Indeed it can be argued that when you make up your mind about something then what happens is that your emotional system gets involved.  
The problem is that emotions don’t always allow us to make the right choice.  Emotions can make us impetuous and risk prone - and indeed selfish. 
Thus a person looking to launch a business, but who has always been an employee, might feel that she needs to “push the boat out” - and have the feeling that she has always been too cautious.  In such a state of mind being cautious becomes associated with failure - the real winners (the rich, the successful) are seen as people who go out there are do it.   Following such a scenario successful business people are not seen as those who carefully weigh up the options, consider alternatives, look at fall-back positions in case something goes amiss, but simply as those who go out and do it.
This emotional state leads a person to be very vulnerable to advertising that suggests that there are easy ways to make money, in the same way that advertising of certain clothes styles can lead one to be more attractive, or more successful. 
Source: Daniel Fessler, University of California.    LA.   Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes    vol 95 p107
 
My point here is that direct mail has descended into alchemy – it is just a mass of mumbo-jumbo without proper explanations.    My piece above is part of a long article which examine ten different issues within the psychology of advertising, each drawing on a different source.  
 
That at least makes an attempt to be scientific, rather than just saying “hey guys I’ve got a way to make you a fortune – cross my palm with silver and then go and get a drop of bat’s blood to sprinkle on your key board…”
 
Of course my approach which replies on science is more boring, and takes longer – but I suspect it gets better results.  In fact, as I wipe the bat’s blood off my desk, I’m sure of it.
 
Tony Attwood

|